Exporting nuclear secrecy. The transatlantic diffusion of nuclear secrecy practices in the postwar period (1945-1953)

Cambridge Review of International Affairs

Fraise, Thomas. “Exporting nuclear secrecy. The transatlantic diffusion of nuclear secrecy practices in the postwar period (1945-1953)”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Online First, 1-23. © The Author (2026) DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2026.2732196

This article examines how United States (US) nuclear secrecy standards shaped the domestic nuclear policies of Western European states between 1945 and the launch of Atoms for Peace. Focusing on the United Kingdom (UK), Sweden and France, it argues that the spread of nuclear secrecy in Europe cannot be explained solely by domestic dynamics but also resulted from international power asymmetries that structured an emerging economy of nuclear secrecy.

Drawing on policy diffusion theory, the article identifies two mechanisms through which US secrecy norms diffused to partner states: coercion and imitation. Coercion operated through conditional access to valued resources—scientific information, technology, and political cooperation—when European practices were deemed incompatible with US containment priorities. Imitation, by contrast, reflected European policymakers’ efforts to conform to what they perceived as appropriate behaviour within an asymmetric relationship, adopting stricter secrecy practices to signal reliability and secure future cooperation. Based on archival evidence, the article shows how US expectations reshaped European information-control regimes, demonstrating how international power relations can produce domestic secrecy practices. In doing so, it highlights the central role of diffusion mechanisms in early nuclear ordering efforts.

H-Diplo|Jervis Forum Review 190: Fraise on Lubot, “Keeping a Finger on the Button”

Fraise, Thomas, H-Diplo|Jervis Forum Review 190: Fraise on Lubot, “Keeping a Finger on the Button”, 29 July 2026.

Book review for the Robert Jervis International Security Studies Forum at H-Diplo

 

 

Hacker la bombe ? Ce que l’IA Mythos révèle du pari de la dissuasion nucléaire

Op-ed in The Conversation France

Fraise, Thomas. “Hacker la bombe ? Ce que l’IA Mythos révèle du pari de la dissuasion nucléaire (To Hack the bomb? What Mythos IA reveals about the nuclear deterrence gamble)”, The Conversation France, May 7th, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64628/AAK.awp597wau

Special Forum ‘Ritual Action in World Politics’ published in the Global Studies Quarterly (OUP)

The team of ERC Ritual Deterrence and the extended academic family of the project have published a Special Forum entitled ‘Ritual Action in World Politics’ in vol 6, no. 1 (January issue) of the International Studies Association’s fully open access journal Global Studies Quarterly, published by Oxford University Press. The forum was guest edited by Maria Mälksoo.

The Special Forum comprises of 13 articles:

  1. Maria Mälksoo (University of Copenhagen): The Logic of Ritual Action in International Relations, https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksag014
  2. Jorg Kustermans (University of Antwerp): Is Ritual a Useful Resource? Instrumental and Non-Instrumental Interpretations of Ritual Action, https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksag013
  3. Kjølv Egeland (NORSAR): Rituals in Nuclear Statecraft: Conjuring Conformity, Cohesion, and Cooperation, https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksag017
  4. Cameron Hunter (University of Copenhagen): Ritualized Coordination in the PLA Rocket Force: Nuclear Deterrence, Control, and Sacrifice, https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksag018
  5. Mariia Vladymyrova (University of Copenhagen): A Show of Force: The Ritualization of Russian Strategic Posturing in the Baltic Sea, https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksag012
  6. Amir Lupovici (Tel Aviv University): The War in Ukraine: Deterrence, Rituals, and Ontological Security, https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksag016
  7. Andrew R. Hom (University of Edinburgh): Ritual Wartiming in Russia’s Three-day Special Military Operation, 2022-2025: “Everyone Must Feel Mobilized”, https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksag020
  8. Vanessa F. Newby (Monash University) and Chiara Ruffa (Sciences Po, Paris): Rituals without Rapprochement? Managing Hostility at the Tripartite Meetings in the United Nations Mission in Lebanon, https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksag019
  9. Juha A. Vuori (University of Turku): Review as Ritual: Maintaining and Disrupting Nuclear Deterrence through the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Review Process, https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksag021
  10. Thierry Balzacq (Sciences Po, Paris): Diplomatic Order: The Problem of Ritual Efficacy in International Relations, https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksag023
  11. Thomas Fraise (University of Copenhagen): The Magicians of Nuclear Strategy: Ritualized Knowledge Production and the Origins of Strategic Nuclear Thought, https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksag015
  12. Christian Bueger (University of Copenhagen): Sites of Ritualized Practice: Observations from Multi-National Military Gatherings and Naval Symposiums, https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksag022
  13. Dorothy Noyes (Ohio State University): Ritual and the Life of International Orders, https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksag024

Conclusion to Critical Perspectives on NATO: Feminist Insights (Bristol UP, 2026)

Russian Fisheries in the High North: Deterrence in the Grey Zone

A Show of Force: The Ritualization of Russian Strategic Posturing in the Baltic Sea

Rituals in Nuclear Statecraft: Conjuring Conformity, Cohesion, and Cooperation

Ritualized Coordination in the PLA Rocket Force: Nuclear Deterrence, Control, and Sacrifice

The Magicians of Nuclear Strategy: Ritualized Knowledge Production and the Origins of Strategic Nuclear Thought